DawnWatch: People magazine asks, “Should strays be killed?” — Nov 6 , 2006 edition
Tuesday, October 31st, 2006
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: DawnWatch – news [at] dawnwatch.com
Date: Oct 31, 2006 11:11 AM
Subject: DawnWatch: People magazine asks, “Should strays be killed?” — Nov 6 , 2006 edition
The current, November 6, edition of People Magazine includes an article by Bill Hewitt, headed, “Should Strays Be Killed?” (p99)
The subtitle is “No-kill animal shelters are catching on, but some critics — including PETA — say they can lead to greater cruelty.”
It opens with a discussion of Maddie’s Pet Adoption Center in San Francisco. Then we are told that the no-kill movement is taking off, with New York and Houston both making plans to follow San Francisco’s lead and head towards a system under which “no healthy or treatable animal would be euthanized simply because it didn’t have a home.”
We read about PETA’s resistance to no-kill:
“Although the movement has gathered steam, it has also come in for a fair amount of criticism, with some of the harshest coming from a startling source. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the hard-line animal-rights group, has argued that euthanasia is the most humane way to deal with unwanted animals. ‘It’s not a popular position, because to the average person, no-kill does sound like such a good idea,’ says Daphna Nachminovitch, the director of PETA’s domestic-animal department. ‘But it’s a sad sham.’”
We read, however:
“In New York, which received a $15 million pledge from Maddie’s Fund, the efforts are bearing fruit. Four years ago 76 percent of the animals entering the New York shelter system were euthanized; this year it will be less than 50 percent, largely by promoting adoption and spaying and neutering. ‘This is doable,’ says Jane Hoffman, president of the Mayor’s Alliance for New York City’s Animals. ‘And we’re doing it in one of the most difficult cities in America.’”
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: DawnWatch – news [at] dawnwatch.com
Date: Oct 31, 2006 11:11 AM
Subject: DawnWatch: People magazine asks, “Should strays be killed?” — Nov 6 , 2006 edition
The current, November 6, edition of People Magazine includes an article by Bill Hewitt, headed, “Should Strays Be Killed?” (p99)
The subtitle is “No-kill animal shelters are catching on, but some critics — including PETA — say they can lead to greater cruelty.”
It opens with a discussion of Maddie’s Pet Adoption Center in San Francisco. Then we are told that the no-kill movement is taking off, with New York and Houston both making plans to follow San Francisco’s lead and head towards a system under which “no healthy or treatable animal would be euthanized simply because it didn’t have a home.”
We read about PETA’s resistance to no-kill:
“Although the movement has gathered steam, it has also come in for a fair amount of criticism, with some of the harshest coming from a startling source. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the hard-line animal-rights group, has argued that euthanasia is the most humane way to deal with unwanted animals. ‘It’s not a popular position, because to the average person, no-kill does sound like such a good idea,’ says Daphna Nachminovitch, the director of PETA’s domestic-animal department. ‘But it’s a sad sham.’”
We read, however:
“In New York, which received a $15 million pledge from Maddie’s Fund, the efforts are bearing fruit. Four years ago 76 percent of the animals entering the New York shelter system were euthanized; this year it will be less than 50 percent, largely by promoting adoption and spaying and neutering. ‘This is doable,’ says Jane Hoffman, president of the Mayor’s Alliance for New York City’s Animals. ‘And we’re doing it in one of the most difficult cities in America.’”



