<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On &#8220;fur hags&#8221; and &#8220;fucking bitches.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.easyvegan.info/2009/01/25/on-fur-hags-and-fucking-bitches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.easyvegan.info/2009/01/25/on-fur-hags-and-fucking-bitches/</link>
	<description>Heathen. Vegan. Feminist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:40:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: easyVegan.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lettuce be thankful!</title>
		<link>http://www.easyvegan.info/2009/01/25/on-fur-hags-and-fucking-bitches/comment-page-1/#comment-740412</link>
		<dc:creator>easyVegan.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lettuce be thankful!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyvegan.info/?p=2903#comment-740412</guid>
		<description>[...] bounds of legitimate criticism, but insulting their physical appearance, usually through the use of sexist slurs), it shows the audience from whence their fur came. Namely, once-living, breathing, sentient [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bounds of legitimate criticism, but insulting their physical appearance, usually through the use of sexist slurs), it shows the audience from whence their fur came. Namely, once-living, breathing, sentient [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: easyVegan.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; easyVegan Link Sanctuary, 2009-04-02</title>
		<link>http://www.easyvegan.info/2009/01/25/on-fur-hags-and-fucking-bitches/comment-page-1/#comment-736413</link>
		<dc:creator>easyVegan.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; easyVegan Link Sanctuary, 2009-04-02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyvegan.info/?p=2903#comment-736413</guid>
		<description>[...] to your readers.&#8221; [Incidentally, I&#039;m disappointed to see the Anti-Fur Society use the term &#039;fur hag&#039; in its action alert, i.e., &quot;We are going after local fur hags and their adepts, starting with the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to your readers.&#8221; [Incidentally, I'm disappointed to see the Anti-Fur Society use the term 'fur hag' in its action alert, i.e., "We are going after local fur hags and their adepts, starting with the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smite Me! [.net] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ARA PSAs: Women, Men and Fur</title>
		<link>http://www.easyvegan.info/2009/01/25/on-fur-hags-and-fucking-bitches/comment-page-1/#comment-706133</link>
		<dc:creator>Smite Me! [.net] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ARA PSAs: Women, Men and Fur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyvegan.info/?p=2903#comment-706133</guid>
		<description>[...] January&#8217;s &#8220;fur hag&#8221; post, I&#8217;d like follow up with several examples of anti-fur ads that I like - albeit, with a few [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January&#8217;s &#8220;fur hag&#8221; post, I&#8217;d like follow up with several examples of anti-fur ads that I like &#8211; albeit, with a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: easyVegan.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ARA PSAs: Women, Men and Fur</title>
		<link>http://www.easyvegan.info/2009/01/25/on-fur-hags-and-fucking-bitches/comment-page-1/#comment-706130</link>
		<dc:creator>easyVegan.info &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ARA PSAs: Women, Men and Fur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyvegan.info/?p=2903#comment-706130</guid>
		<description>[...] January&#8217;s &#8220;fur hag&#8221; post, I&#8217;d like follow up with several examples of anti-fur ads that I like - albeit, with a few [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January&#8217;s &#8220;fur hag&#8221; post, I&#8217;d like follow up with several examples of anti-fur ads that I like &#8211; albeit, with a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.easyvegan.info/2009/01/25/on-fur-hags-and-fucking-bitches/comment-page-1/#comment-672328</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyvegan.info/?p=2903#comment-672328</guid>
		<description>I get what you&#039;re saying about PETA employing shock value, ARPhilo - sometimes it works (I loved their campaign over the summer wherein they placed ads for &quot;free new puppy gifts&quot; in pro-breeding dog mags - the &quot;gift&quot; being a body bag, to symbolize the shelter dog who is &quot;euthanized&quot;), sometimes not so much. I do wish they were a little more open to criticism from within the AR community, especially since they&#039;re so influential with teh youngsters. 

Re: language, I&#039;m still working on phasing out certain terms, myself. As humans, I think we&#039;re all never-ending works in progress, so many of these &quot;isms&quot; are just hammered into us from birth. 

I think you&#039;re safe with &quot;dude,&quot; though - to me, it&#039;s like the male equivalent of &quot;gal&quot; or &quot;lady.&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get what you&#8217;re saying about PETA employing shock value, ARPhilo &#8211; sometimes it works (I loved their campaign over the summer wherein they placed ads for &#8220;free new puppy gifts&#8221; in pro-breeding dog mags &#8211; the &#8220;gift&#8221; being a body bag, to symbolize the shelter dog who is &#8220;euthanized&#8221;), sometimes not so much. I do wish they were a little more open to criticism from within the AR community, especially since they&#8217;re so influential with teh youngsters. </p>
<p>Re: language, I&#8217;m still working on phasing out certain terms, myself. As humans, I think we&#8217;re all never-ending works in progress, so many of these &#8220;isms&#8221; are just hammered into us from birth. </p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re safe with &#8220;dude,&#8221; though &#8211; to me, it&#8217;s like the male equivalent of &#8220;gal&#8221; or &#8220;lady.&#8221; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARPhilo</title>
		<link>http://www.easyvegan.info/2009/01/25/on-fur-hags-and-fucking-bitches/comment-page-1/#comment-672294</link>
		<dc:creator>ARPhilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyvegan.info/?p=2903#comment-672294</guid>
		<description>Wow, I had no idea peta had these campaigns going. I can&#039;t say I am surprised. I have always noticed an extreme lack of education in many of peta&#039;s campaigns. Sometimes I believe there must only be shock and attention as motives there. They would do well to have someone who knows a bit about science, feminism, and ethics on their teams. I am surprised they don&#039;t.

Anyways, I won&#039;t act like I have never said &quot;Fur Hag&quot; in passing amongst friends and I won&#039;t deny that I have ever used the word &quot;bitch&quot; or &quot;chick&quot; or &quot;dude&quot; or whatever. The idea of using it for an actual campaign is simply tasteless and useless. But, you do bring up a very good argument for eliminating it from my vocabulary completely.

I am far from being a politically correct. It&#039;s just my nature (even as a feminist), but I do see how fur hag being directed only towards women and the focus being on women definitely goes against feminism. 

Thanks for the entry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I had no idea peta had these campaigns going. I can&#8217;t say I am surprised. I have always noticed an extreme lack of education in many of peta&#8217;s campaigns. Sometimes I believe there must only be shock and attention as motives there. They would do well to have someone who knows a bit about science, feminism, and ethics on their teams. I am surprised they don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Anyways, I won&#8217;t act like I have never said &#8220;Fur Hag&#8221; in passing amongst friends and I won&#8217;t deny that I have ever used the word &#8220;bitch&#8221; or &#8220;chick&#8221; or &#8220;dude&#8221; or whatever. The idea of using it for an actual campaign is simply tasteless and useless. But, you do bring up a very good argument for eliminating it from my vocabulary completely.</p>
<p>I am far from being a politically correct. It&#8217;s just my nature (even as a feminist), but I do see how fur hag being directed only towards women and the focus being on women definitely goes against feminism. </p>
<p>Thanks for the entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smite Me! [.net] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On &#8220;fur hags&#8221; and &#8220;fucking bitches.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.easyvegan.info/2009/01/25/on-fur-hags-and-fucking-bitches/comment-page-1/#comment-672208</link>
		<dc:creator>Smite Me! [.net] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On &#8220;fur hags&#8221; and &#8220;fucking bitches.&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyvegan.info/?p=2903#comment-672208</guid>
		<description>[...] (Crossposted from.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Crossposted from.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
