Attn: MSM

February 17th, 2009 3:18 pm by Kelly Garbato

Dear members of the mainstream news media,

Many of you are reporting that the death toll in the recent Australian wildfires now hovers around 200, with numbers likely to rise.

Take, for example, the following headlines:

Australia fire deaths rise to 200 (BBC News)

Australia wildfire death toll reaches 200 (the AP)

Talk Vic toll may reach 300 ‘a rumour’ (Sydney Morning Herald)

News flash: the “death toll” has already surpassed 200, at least 5,000 times over.

To wit: “Millions of animals are estimated to have died in the ferocious Black Saturday bushfires that swept across countryside, towns and farmland in Australia’s southeast.”

Millions of animals – men, women, children, chickens, canaries, koalas, kangaroos, wallabies, possums, deer, dogs, cats, horses, ducks, peacocks, lyrebirds, goats and dingoes, to name just a few of the affected species – have died. The death toll is catastrophic; the loss of life, tragic.

Please don’t imply that some of these lives are insignificant by excluding them from your discourse. If you mean that 200 human lives have been lost, say so. Your sloppy/lazy/negligent reporting and/or headline copyrighting does a disservice to the majority of the fire’s victims – and to those who care for their well-being.


The veg*n language police



Be Sociable, Share!

Filed under , , , ,

2 Responses to “Attn: MSM”

  1. Alex Says:

    Could point. This is one of those mental barriers erected for a purpose: to shield us from the moral implications of our actions. If we admit that “loss of life” includes nonhuman animals in this instance, we concede that nonhuman animals have a “life” that can be lost (just like ours!) and therefore perhaps we should give their lives some consideration.

Leave a Reply