<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lettuce be thankful!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.easyvegan.info/2009/04/06/lettuce-be-thankful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.easyvegan.info/2009/04/06/lettuce-be-thankful/</link>
	<description>Heathen. Vegan. Feminist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:13:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly G.</title>
		<link>http://www.easyvegan.info/2009/04/06/lettuce-be-thankful/comment-page-1/#comment-742506</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyvegan.info/?p=5523#comment-742506</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for the links! There are a few ads up there that I haven&#039;t seen before.

Some of my other favorites are Steve-O&#039;s series. He&#039;s butt-naked - literally - but it&#039;s really fun and silly, and plays to his personality. I&#039;d love if more of the ads involving women were like that, but the women tend to be depicted in typical porn positions - on all fours, backs arched, looking all passive and submissive. You rarely see women running around, being goofy and stuff. 

I was surfing around on Flickr last night, and found a set of vegan t-shirt photos that really illustrate this difference: http://www.flickr.com/photos/veganstraightedge/sets/72157606990641119/

Notice how some of the women models are positioned like they&#039;re in a Maxim photoshoot, while none of the guys are. In fact, dare I say that the dudes would look ridiculous posed like this?: http://www.flickr.com/photos/veganstraightedge/3114345654/in/set-72157606990641119/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for the links! There are a few ads up there that I haven&#8217;t seen before.</p>
<p>Some of my other favorites are Steve-O&#8217;s series. He&#8217;s butt-naked &#8211; literally &#8211; but it&#8217;s really fun and silly, and plays to his personality. I&#8217;d love if more of the ads involving women were like that, but the women tend to be depicted in typical porn positions &#8211; on all fours, backs arched, looking all passive and submissive. You rarely see women running around, being goofy and stuff. </p>
<p>I was surfing around on Flickr last night, and found a set of vegan t-shirt photos that really illustrate this difference: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/veganstraightedge/sets/72157606990641119/" rel="nofollow">www.flickr.com/photos/veganstraightedge/sets/72157606990641119/</a></p>
<p>Notice how some of the women models are positioned like they&#8217;re in a Maxim photoshoot, while none of the guys are. In fact, dare I say that the dudes would look ridiculous posed like this?: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/veganstraightedge/3114345654/in/set-72157606990641119/" rel="nofollow">www.flickr.com/photos/veganstraightedge/3114345654/in/set-72157606990641119/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARPhilo</title>
		<link>http://www.easyvegan.info/2009/04/06/lettuce-be-thankful/comment-page-1/#comment-742493</link>
		<dc:creator>ARPhilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.easyvegan.info/?p=5523#comment-742493</guid>
		<description>I like some of the &quot;Ink not Mink&quot; ads they did.

I mean, like many AR advocates, I have my issues with PETA. But some of the ads you have shown here are tasteful and are not chauvinistic. I also have no problem with nudity. I grew up an artist drawing nudes as a young teenager so I understand the difference between a naked bidy and pornographic exploitation of someone.

I like this one: http://static.squidoo.com/resize/squidoo_images/-1/draft_lens1930873module8982080photo_franka-ink-not-mink.jpg1207324117 Partially because &quot;Run Lola Run&quot;&#039;s Franka Potente is in it and the nudity is tasteful. 

Ink not Mink also has a lot of nudity (of people of different genders and colors) without it being sleezy and a lot of it is with men (some are still on the nasty side but most tend to pass). http://images.google.com/images?q=ink%20not%20mink&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sa=N&amp;hl=en&amp;tab=wi It has a way of being radical and even a bit rude- giving the finger to the fur industry- (which I always like) without being gross about it. 

I do think sometimes the PETA people have good intentions with the ads, but they often end up showing that they are one of the groups that doesn&#039;t understand all of the human issues involved in the animal rights movement- dividing the movement and as a result, weakening the larger movement at hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like some of the &#8220;Ink not Mink&#8221; ads they did.</p>
<p>I mean, like many AR advocates, I have my issues with PETA. But some of the ads you have shown here are tasteful and are not chauvinistic. I also have no problem with nudity. I grew up an artist drawing nudes as a young teenager so I understand the difference between a naked bidy and pornographic exploitation of someone.</p>
<p>I like this one: <a href="http://static.squidoo.com/resize/squidoo_images/-1/draft_lens1930873module8982080photo_franka-ink-not-mink.jpg1207324117" rel="nofollow">static.squidoo.com/resize/squidoo_images/-1/draft_lens1930873module8982080photo_franka-ink-not-mink.jpg1207324117</a> Partially because &#8220;Run Lola Run&#8221;&#8216;s Franka Potente is in it and the nudity is tasteful. </p>
<p>Ink not Mink also has a lot of nudity (of people of different genders and colors) without it being sleezy and a lot of it is with men (some are still on the nasty side but most tend to pass). <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=ink%20not%20mink&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;um=1&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;sa=N&#038;hl=en&#038;tab=wi" rel="nofollow">images.google.com/images?q=ink%20not%20mink&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;um=1&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;sa=N&#038;hl=en&#038;tab=wi</a> It has a way of being radical and even a bit rude- giving the finger to the fur industry- (which I always like) without being gross about it. </p>
<p>I do think sometimes the PETA people have good intentions with the ads, but they often end up showing that they are one of the groups that doesn&#8217;t understand all of the human issues involved in the animal rights movement- dividing the movement and as a result, weakening the larger movement at hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.easyvegan.info/2009/04/06/lettuce-be-thankful/feed/ ) in 0.12423 seconds, on Feb 12th, 2012 at 6:41 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 7:41 pm UTC -->
