Shocking the dogren & other acts of “manliness.”
Sunday, February 1st, 2009
In their latest link roundup, Vegan Soapbox includes not one, but two recent examples of intersecting oppressions in the news.
First up, in the AP, “Ohio dad who shock-collared kids gets 16 years“:
An Ohio man has been sentenced to 16 years in prison for disciplining his children with a dog shock collar.
David Liskany of Jamestown had pleaded guilty to charges of felonious assault and attempted felonious assault.
In court Friday, Greene County Common Pleas Judge J. Timothy Campbell compared the punishments to torture.
The judge said Liskany punished the children in 2006 and 2007 by putting them in cold showers, holding them underwater and using the shock collar, which is commonly used to train dogs.
The judge said the case sounded “like something from Guantanamo Bay.”
The children are now 5, 12 and 14.
As Elaine noted, shock collars used on children constitute “felonious assault,” “Yet shock collars are OK for dogs!?!”
Honestly, this case should come as no surprise. When we (either collectively, as a society, or on an individual level) come to accept physical punishment as a legitimate training method for use on the family “pet” - an innocent, sentient being - should we be shocked (pun intended) when this form of training is extended to other, “lesser” members of the family? If it’s socially acceptable to shock a dog for doing what comes naturally - instead of employing gentler, more humane training methods - then how might we expect Dad to react when his young children act in a similarly “wild” or “disobedient” manner? We’ve already told Dad that violence is permissible, even preferable in some situations*; we’ve eliminated the taboo against inflicting unnecessary harm. If the cane is ok for “his dog,” why not “his children,” as well?
In the above paragraph, I use the term “lesser” deliberately, for - as far as the “traditional” nuclear family goes - Dad occupies his position at the apex, followed by Mom, the children and (finally) any non-human members of the household. Everyone is “lesser” from where Dad sits. Start abusing those lowest on the ladder, and it’s only a matter of time before the violence seeps upward.
In their latest link roundup, Vegan Soapbox includes not one, but two recent examples of intersecting oppressions in the news.
First up, in the AP, “Ohio dad who shock-collared kids gets 16 years“:
An Ohio man has been sentenced to 16 years in prison for disciplining his children with a dog shock collar.
David Liskany of Jamestown had pleaded guilty to charges of felonious assault and attempted felonious assault.
In court Friday, Greene County Common Pleas Judge J. Timothy Campbell compared the punishments to torture.
The judge said Liskany punished the children in 2006 and 2007 by putting them in cold showers, holding them underwater and using the shock collar, which is commonly used to train dogs.
The judge said the case sounded “like something from Guantanamo Bay.”
The children are now 5, 12 and 14.
As Elaine noted, shock collars used on children constitute “felonious assault,” “Yet shock collars are OK for dogs!?!”
Honestly, this case should come as no surprise. When we (either collectively, as a society, or on an individual level) come to accept physical punishment as a legitimate training method for use on the family “pet” - an innocent, sentient being - should we be shocked (pun intended) when this form of training is extended to other, “lesser” members of the family? If it’s socially acceptable to shock a dog for doing what comes naturally - instead of employing gentler, more humane training methods - then how might we expect Dad to react when his young children act in a similarly “wild” or “disobedient” manner? We’ve already told Dad that violence is permissible, even preferable in some situations*; we’ve eliminated the taboo against inflicting unnecessary harm. If the cane is ok for “his dog,” why not “his children,” as well?
In the above paragraph, I use the term “lesser” deliberately, for - as far as the “traditional” nuclear family goes - Dad occupies his position at the apex, followed by Mom, the children and (finally) any non-human members of the household. Everyone is “lesser” from where Dad sits. Start abusing those lowest on the ladder, and it’s only a matter of time before the violence seeps upward.












